Stephen Hans Blog by cjleclaire
Employment and Labor Law Attorneys
Jan 16, 2013 | 157511 views | 0 0 comments | 310 310 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

view as list
Lockheed Martin Age Discrimination Lawsuit | $51.5 Million in Damages
by cjleclaire
Apr 20, 2017 | 8664 views | 0 0 comments | 59 59 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

In January 2017, a federal jury in Camden, NJ awarded a verdict of $51.5 million against Lockheed Martin for alleged age discrimination.

Law.com reported that the lawsuit claimed Lockheed Martin had a practice of laying off older employees and replacing them with newer employees for the same position.

Age Discrimination

Lockheed Martin Age Discrimination Case Details

Plaintiff Robert Braden, whose title was Project Specialist, Senior Staff at the Lockheed Martin facility in Moorestown, NJ brought a lawsuit against the company after being laid off when he was 66 years old. The company laid off five employees out of the 110 employed at the facility, and all five were over 50 years old. Braden said the company gave no reason for laying him off and did not use any objective measures to decide which employees to lay off. Despite laying off employees, the company continued to recruit and hire younger employees for positions Braden was also qualified to hold.

Braden brought the lawsuit under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (NJLAD) and the American Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA).

Work Background Details about Braden, the Plaintiff

Braden first started working for the Moorestown facility in 1984 when RCA was the owner, and as the company went through a series of different owners as a result of mergers and acquisitions, he eventually became a Lockheed Martin employee in 1995.

The Verdict

The jury awarded Braden $520,000 in back pay under the ADEA and another $520,000 for emotional distress. They also awarded $50 million in punitive damages against Lockheed Martin.

If you are a business owner and have questions about age discrimination, consult with an experienced employment lawyer to avoid disputes and lawsuits.

Stephen Hans & Associates is an employment and labor law firm that assists small and medium sized business owners. This has been our legal focus for more than 20 years.

comments (0)
view/post comments
no comments yet

WHAT IS THE NEW YORK WOMEN’S EQUALITY AGENDA?
by cjleclaire
Apr 20, 2017 | 8079 views | 0 0 comments | 585 585 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

In October 2015, New York passed eight bills that were known as the Women’s Equality Agenda. Seven of the provisions of this law went into effect on January 19, 2016. As an employer, it is important to understand your rights and responsibilities under this new equal pay law in New York.

What Are the Main Changes in the Women’s Equality Agenda that Affect Employers?

One aspect of the Women’s Equality Agenda increases women’s protection against pay differentials based on sex by replacing the current “any other factor than sex” exception, which typically referred to seniority, merit, or a quantity/quality of production system and other non-sex related factors. The law replaces the “any other factor than sex” with “a bona fide factor other than sex, such as education, training or experience.”

The factor must be job-related and the exception would not be valid if the employee could demonstrate that:

  • The employer uses “a particular employment practice that causes a disparate impact on the basis of sex.”
  • There was an alternate employment practice that would accomplish the same business purpose and the “employer has refused to adopt such a practice.”

Also, the law defines “business necessity” as a factor that bears a relevant relationship to the employment in question.

Geographical Location

Two comparable employees in two different physical locations that are in the same geographic region should not show a differential in pay.

Right to Share Wage Information

Companies cannot prohibit employees from sharing wage information, and this would allow employees to discover whether pay was equal for both sexes.

Penalty for Wage Violation

Previously, employees who did not receive equal pay could collect 100% of the pay owed. But under the new law, employers owe them 300% in liquidated damages for the wages found to be due.

If you have questions or concerns about equal pay, Stephen Hans & Associates provide you with legal information and advise you in what to do.

comments (0)
view/post comments
no comments yet

Best Business Practices When Screening Applicants with Criminal Records
by cjleclaire
Mar 16, 2017 | 11344 views | 0 0 comments | 790 790 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink
Author: Stephen D. Hans & Associates

When an applicant with a criminal record applies for a job at your company, the screening can become complicated. You cannot make your decision based on any type of discrimination.

The EEOC provides guidelines you should consider following when asking about criminal backgrounds.

For example, let’s say two applicants have comparable educational and employment experience backgrounds. They are both college graduates in the same field with equivalent job performance histories. Both applicants have criminal convictions for possessing marijuana as minors. One is African American and one is Caucasian. Your reason for hiring one over the other cannot be based on belonging to protected classes under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act including race, color, sex, or nationality.

employment best practices

You should follow these hiring guidelines:

  • Treat applicants with similar criminal records consistently. If you screen out African American candidates because of a particular criminal record then you should also screen out other individuals of different colors and races with the same criminal record.
  • Sometimes a policy or practice can significantly disadvantage people of a certain protected class in a certain region. However, it may be important if you can show that in the geographical area where you are recruiting, the percentage of Hispanics or African Americans with arrest records is not higher than Caucasians in the same area. This establishes that you aren’t disadvantaging protected classes based on criminal backgrounds.
  • Delay asking for criminal background information until later in the hiring process. It’s better if you can evaluate an applicant’s other qualifications before asking about a criminal record. However, depending on the laws where your business operates, you may be required to check criminal backgrounds early in the process.
  • Evaluate the criminal history in relation to the risks and responsibilities of the job. The nature of the crime, how long ago the criminal arrest or conviction occurred and the nature of the job are factors to consider.
  • Treat arrest records differently than conviction records. Arrest records can be inaccurate and are not proof a crime was committed. Even so, an arrest can lead to an investigation of the conduct underlying the arrest and be a factor in a negative employment decision.
  • Review the accuracy and relevance of a conviction record before making an employment decision based on the arrest record. After reviewing the criminal record, you may decide it was inaccurate.
  • Give applicants an opportunity to explain their criminal history. Hearing the applicant’s side of the story is often important, including how their views and life has changed since the arrest or conviction.

Stephen Hans & Associates assists small and medium sized business ownerwith employment related concerns.

comments (0)
view/post comments
no comments yet

What Kinds of Employment Records Does Your Business Have to Keep?
by cjleclaire
Mar 10, 2017 | 11342 views | 0 0 comments | 98 98 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

There is a lot of administration involved with running a business, and sometimes you wonder what records to keep and how long you have to keep them.

The EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission)clarifies what your record keeping requirements are under federal law as the following:

  • The EEOC requires you to keep all employment records for personnel for one year. If you fire an employee, then you must keep that former employee’s records for one year from the date of termination.
  • The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) requires employers to keep all payroll records for three years. Also if you have employee benefit plans such as pensions and insurance plans, and any written seniority or merit system, you must keep records of these plans for the full time the plan is in effect. Or if you fir the employee, for one year after the employee’s termination.
  • The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) requires you to keep records that could be applicable to the Equal Pay Act (EPA) for at least three years. This includes any records that would explain the reason for paying different wages to employees of opposite sexes who work in the same establishment. You should keep for at least two years records that show wage rates, job evaluations, seniority, merit systems and collective bargaining agreements.

employment records

 

What Records Do You Need if the EEOC Files a Charge on You?

While no one wants to think about having a claim filed against the business with the EEOC, it’s good to be prepared in the event it happens. Let’s say you discover an employee has filed a claim with the EEOC against you. First of all, you’ll receive an EEOC Notice of Charge in the mail that explains your record keeping requirements. You must maintain:

  • Personnel or employment records pertaining to the matter charged and under investigation
  • Matters related to the person bringing the charge or persons allegedly aggrieved according to the charge
  • Records for all other employees holding or seeking similar positions to those people allegedly affected

You must keep these records throughout any EEOC investigation. After the investigation, there is a final disposition period, which means a 90-day statutory period within which the aggrieved person, the party bringing the charge, or the EEOC may file a lawsuit. You must keep records during the disposition period and also throughout the lawsuit and during any appeals being decided.

If you have questions about record keeping or need representation during an EEOC claim, Stephen Hans & Associates can provide you with seasoned legal guidance and litigation.

comments (0)
view/post comments
no comments yet

Is It Time to Update Your Severance Agreements?
by cjleclaire
Feb 28, 2017 | 8603 views | 0 0 comments | 110 110 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink
Author: Stephen D. Hans

Keeping your handbooks, employment agreements, severance agreements and other documents current with laws and legal trends can seem like a lot of work. However, when you get caught on the wrong side of a legal dispute, hindsight says it was well worth the time.

The National Law Review recently published an article entitled “SEC Targets Severance Agreements that Impede Whistleblowers”. The article lists a number of companies the SEC went after because their severance agreements that employees signed had clauses that warned the employee would waive severance or other benefits if they engaged in the following types of activities against the company:

  • Filing a complaint with the SEC
  • Filing a complaint with a government agency
  • Disclosing confidential information, except when disclosure is required by law, in response to a subpoena or with the company’s permission
  • Relaying communication that disparaged, denigrated, maligned or impugned the company or its officers, directors or other associates
  • Voluntarily communicating or contacting a government agency

severance agreements

 

SEC Settled with a Number of Companies

Between 2015 and 2016 and continuing into 2017, the SEC has settled with a number of companies. While names were withheld, examples of settlements included:

$130,000 owed in penalties and an agreement put in place to amend confidentiality statements stating that employees were allowed to report possible violations to the SEC and other government agencies

  • $180,000 penalty
  • $1.4 million penalty
  • $340,000 owed in penalties and the implementation of a mandatory yearly training program to inform employees about their whistleblower rights

Employee termination agreement or contract

 

EEOC Targets Companies

The EEOC has also targeted companies with severance agreement clauses that interfere with the EEOC’s ability to investigate possible discrimination violations.

Get Legal Help with Revising Documentation

Private companies along with public companies are at risk for lawsuits if their legal documents contain clauses that impede employees in regards to reporting information to government agencies.

Stephen Hans & Associates assists small and medium sized business owners with regulatory and employment related concerns.

comments (0)
view/post comments
no comments yet

Recent Ruling on Tip Credits, Tip Pooling and Tipped Employees
by cjleclaire
Feb 24, 2017 | 9088 views | 0 0 comments | 413 413 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

The Ninth Circuit Court decision in a recent case was a landmark ruling that favored tipped employees in the debate of tip pooling. It clarifies whether an employer who is not taking a tip credit can do tip pooling, which divides tips among tipped and non-tipped employees.

The Issue with Tip Pooling with Non-Tipped Employees

The National Law Review  discussed the case of Oregon Rest & Lodging Ass’n v. Perez, which was appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court.

The crucial question was whether employers have the right to share the tips of waitresses, bartenders and casino dealers, etc. (tipped employees) with non-tipped employees like busboys, hostesses and floor managers. When a tipped employee works hard to deliver great customer service and as a result of such efforts receives a large tip, then having to turn it over to other non-tipped employees seems rather unfair.

What Does the FLSA Say?

The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) makes it clear that when employers take a tip credit and pay non-tipped employees less than minimum wage, the tipped employees must receive their tips. However, when the employer does not take a tip credit and tipped employees receive minimum wage or higher, are the tips fair game for pooling among employees?

DOL Rule About Tip Pooling

The Department of Labor (DOL) established its own rule in 2011 because the FLSA wasn’t clear on this point. The DOL decided tipped employees still deserved their tips and pooling was unfair.

Recent Case Conclusion

The Ninth Circuit reviewed at the issue from different angles and various precedent setting cases. It also considered the intent of the law. A Senate Committee report stated, “Tipped employees should have stronger protection” and “tip is … distinguished from payment of charge … [and the customer] has the right to determine who shall be the recipient of the gratuity.” The court majority decided that the DOL rule was fair and that tips are the property of the tipped employee whether the employer claims a tip credit or not.

Stephen Hans & Associates represents business in disputes and provides legal advice to help them deal with employment and labor issues.

comments (0)
view/post comments
no comments yet

Employers, Protect Yourselves | 2017 Harassment Claims
by cjleclaire
Jan 20, 2017 | 10867 views | 0 0 comments | 674 674 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

Author: Stephen D. Hans

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has spent considerable researching and analyzing harassment claims related to federal anti-discrimination laws. Such laws protect individuals based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, disability, age or genetic information harassment.

business-people-hans-blog

According to the Chair of the EEOC, Jenny R. Yang :

“Harassment remains a serious workplace problem that is the concern of all Americans. It is important for employers to understand the actions they can take today to prevent and address harassment in their workplaces.”

The Commission has opened up to the public for input on proposed enforcement guidance.

Harassment Claims on the Rise in the Workplace

Between 2012 and 2015, harassment claims from the private sector increased from slightly more than 25% to 30% to 31% percent of the federal charges filed for 2013, 2014 and 2015 respectively. Dealing effectively with harassment has been an EEOC priority since 2013.

Guidance Based on the Harassment Prevention Report

Employers can benefit from reading about the EEOC’s positions on harassment law. The report gives explanatory examples and recommends practices that companies can implement.

Employer discrimination

Information Contained in the Report

The report describes the scope of hostile work environment claims. It gives examples so you understand the extent to which harassment can occur outside of the regular place of work and how it can impact the workplace. It covers subjectively and objectively hostile work environments.

It can help you determine whether the harassment is severe or pervasive. A single severe incident of harassment can result in a hostile work environment. Pervasive, which means ongoing actions, can also result in a hostile work environment, and the report provides examples of pervasive harassment.

Numerous best practices actions exist that employers can take. One is conducting anonymous employee surveys on a regular basis to detect whether harassment is occurring. Repeated communication to employees about how the company provides easy access to a complaint system is another example. You can implement practices that protect both yourselves as employers and your employees.

You can download the EEOC Proposed EG on Unlawful Harassment for Public Input and provide your feedback to the EEOC.

Stephen Hans & Associates is an employment litigation firm. We have assisted small and medium sized businesses with employment law issues for more than 20 years.

comments (0)
view/post comments
no comments yet

How Do Workers Feel About Overtime Pay?
by cjleclaire
Jan 12, 2017 | 9083 views | 0 0 comments | 509 509 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

Author: Stephen D. Hans

The federal overtime rule has been put on hold, and employers are waiting to see whether the DOL will effectively appeal the injunction imposed by the U.S. District Court in Texas. However, it’s worth your while to consider what kinds of problems the rule sought to resolve and where today’s workforce stands on certain issues.

Today’s Workplace Issues with Overtime

With businesses using texting and emails, the line between work and home life continues to blur. Many workers don’t consider the time they spend on texts or emails outside of work as hours working off-the-clock. A Harris Poll conducted in 2016 showed that 63% workers would work-off-the-clock even if doing so was against company policy.

Here is what survey done by The Workforce Institute revealed:

An overwhelming 81 percent of U.S. salaried employees report they conduct work outside of their standard work hours — often more than once a week.

Why Do Employees Work Off-the-Clock?

Reasons given include urgent deadlines and heavier-than-usual workloads. One-third of those surveyed said they have more work than they can complete during regular work hours.

What Matters Most to Employees?

According to a worldwide survey conducted by Ernst & Young, workers struggle to manage work and family. They give underlying reasons for struggles, such as:

  • Expenses have gone up but salaries haven’t
  • Work responsibilities have increased
  • Younger workers now have children, which means more responsibilities at home
  • The lack of opportunity to advance
  • Excessive overtime hours
  • Work environments that don’t encourage teamwork
  • Employers that don’t allow flexible work schedules

In fact, lack of flexible work schedules rank near the top as reasons to quit one job and take on another, surpassed only by competitive pay and benefits.

Desired Changes in the Work Environment

Balancing home life with work matters significantly because top desirable workplace changes included:

  • Paid parental leave onsite or subsidized childcare
  • Telecommuting one or two days a week
  • Relocating closer to family
  • The ability to shut off emails and calls when needed

While workers want more pay, and certainly pay for overtime, many also simply want more time to spend away from work with their families.

Stephen Hans & Associates works with business owners to help them deal with employment and labor issues.

comments (0)
view/post comments
no comments yet

Employers Walk the Line on Employees’ Social Media Comments
by cjleclaire
Nov 23, 2016 | 14070 views | 0 0 comments | 385 385 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

Author: Stephen D. Hans

As employers, if you feel that an employee’s comment on social media, such as Facebook or Twitter is damaging to your business’s reputation, it is wise to seek legal counsel before firing the employee. Employers can end up in a wrongful termination lawsuit if they do not carefully walk the line where social media is involved. They also may be subject to publicity backlash.

New York Employment-at-Will

Like most states, New York is an “employment-at-will” state. Under the NY Labor Code this means an employer can at any time and for any reason terminate the employment of a worker unless a law (for example discrimination laws) or agreement (union labor contract) provides otherwise.

Employer Social Media Policies

A Forbes Magazine article points out that employers can issue policies that prohibit employees from revealing trade secrets, criticizing customers or creating a hostile work environment through social media posts about the company. Doing so is within their legal rights and protects the company.

However, if an employee has a grievance against the company that is discussed with other company employees online, National Labor Relations Board  (NLRB) advisories and rulings protect employees under these circumstances — even when they’re not union members. Such communication is protected when it aims to improve working conditions.

To Terminate or Not to Terminate an Employee?

Another important factor to consider is whether terminating an employee will result in public backlash that is more damaging than keeping the worker employed.

Uber terminated a driver who had tweeted a link to an article that claimed driving for Uber was not much safer than driving a taxi. The pubic backlashed negatively on social media against Uber when the employee was terminated. Uber ended up reinstating the driver.

Receiving sound legal advice is often the best way to become informed so you can make the right decision.

Stephen Hans & Associates is an employment litigation firm that has assisted small and medium sized businesses with employment law for more than 20 years.

comments (0)
view/post comments
no comments yet

Food Waste Law Tax Incentive for Restaurant Owners
by cjleclaire
Oct 20, 2016 | 11326 views | 0 0 comments | 567 567 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

Author: Stephen D Hans & Associates

Food waste is a problem that restaurants and other businesses in the food industry have grappled with for years.

An article entitled “It’s Time to Rethink Restaurant Food Waste” points out that 84 percent of the food waste restaurants generate ends up in land fills. A corporation with a billion dollar revenue loses money on more than 3 million pounds of food that it pays for but does not use. A 15.7 percent food loss exists across the food industry.

Donating food to charities is a way to offset the loss and help the needy at the same time.

Congress Passed a Law that Increases Tax Incentives against Food Waste

In December of 2015, Congress passed the PATH ACT, which improved the tax incentives for food donation.

Food diet for pets

Here is how the law improved tax incentives:

  • Now not only C corporations but other corporations can also carry forward the deductions for five years, the same way C corporations do.
  • Farmers can claim 25 percent of the donated food’s fair market value as the food production cost and so can other “cash method” accounting taxpayers.
  • The allowable charitable contributions cap was raised from 10 percent to 15 percent.

This change for C corps is permanent and it also included 2015 donations made by corporations that were not C corps. The law creates an advantage for small and mid-sized restaurant owners, enabling them to donate food to charities and write off a percentage of the donation for up to 15 percent of their adjusted gross income.

Lucky Stores Inc, v. Commission of Internal Revenue is also case that affected charity donations and tax write offs. It was fundamental in establishing the fair market value (FMV) of unused food.

Stephen Hans & Associates is an employment litigation firm that assists restaurant owners and defends small and medium sized businesses in discrimination, labor law and other employment related matters.

comments (0)
view/post comments
no comments yet

page
2 3 .. 10